Do Magnet Schools Work? :: essays research papers

Do Magnet Schools Actu altogethery Work?     The 1954 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in dark-brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, represented a turning point in the history of the United States. (144) Reversing the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson ruling, which said that racially "separate but equal" reality institutions were legal, the solicit held that segregated public schools were "inherently unequal" and denied black children equal protection under the law. It later directed that the state provide desegregated educational facilities "with all deliberate speed." Kansas had been only one of many states that had "separate but equal" schools that were affected by the decision. Although Southern white officials sought to obstruct implementation of the browned decision, many blacks saw the ruling as a sign that the federal government might intervene on their behalf in other racial matters.    &nbs p The court ruled that the schools would have to come up with a solution to the problem of desegregating the schools. Special schools called Magnet Schools were set up. These schools were designed as a desegregation method. in that respect were three methods used in the desegregation of the schools. Black students were bussed out to the suburbs to attend white schools, white children were bussed into the city to attend black schools, or both races were conflate in different schools. There are two types of magnet Durham 2schools. The full site school is where all students in a finical district transfer into the school and are mixed together in the magnet schedule. Partial site programs offer a special magnet program within a non-magnet general school, even though students still transfer into the school to participate in the magnet curriculum. The focus of these schools is to achieve racial parallelism and increase educational quality. (146)      Some of t he problems with magnet schools were that they would siphon off the better students from a school district, leaving all the educationally at-risk students. (147) Most of these students that were left fag end were members of a minority group such as Black or Hispanic. Another problem with magnet schools is that they might already be aimed at halfway class families. This is done to try to avoid desegregation by some parents so their children will not have to go to school with members of a minority.      Removing students from a given school district also removes resources from students most in need from this interaction.

Heartbeat of a City: The Influence of Soccer in Rome :: Free Essays Online

Heartbeat of a City The Influence of Soccer in Rome The number one time I went to Italy the taxi driver that picked my parents and I up at Romes Fiumicino airport had his radio turned to a station compete a Serie A soccer match between two Italian powerhouse teams, AS Roma and Turins Juventus FC. At first I solely assumed the low-level, even sound of the announcers vocalisation was merely a talk radio show, besides as I heard the excitement in his voice build as apiece team became closer to scoring, and the background sounds of the crowds chanting and singing for their teams I began to understand the phenomenon that calico, the Italian word for soccer, was in Italy. Literally the flashgun of a nation whose history has been tumultuous to say the least, soccer has been a mainstay in Italian culture for generations. Known as the worlds most popular sport, professional soccer has helped create and define different groups of people around the world for longer than a century. The hoopla surrounding teams, geographical areas fans dwell in, and political ideals associated with individual clubs have carved an identity for millions of supporters whose heart and soul becomes dedicated to their favorite players, stadiums, and coaches. Soccer teams and their fans can give us a window into how people can be divided and defined by their allegiances and ideals, and why those with similar views band together to create a familiar milieu for themselves. Large questions still remain about the role of soccer in todays world. Why do people in Europe and afield become so dedicated to their teams, over all other cultural factors like politics, clubs, and organizations? How does soccer affect Italian and Roman political allegiances, and how does the commitment of each teams fans affect the Roman urban space, the policies and reactions of the Italian government, and each other? By uncovering and defining the importance of soccer in Rome, I am arguing that Roman soccer fans are not only divided by team colors and name, but also by geography within the city, political allegiances, and social differences. I am also arguing that the importance of soccer represents far more than an interest in a game, but a representation of all that a Roman citizen, as well as the majority of all Europeans, live for and love.

Perceptions of the 18th Century Novel in Ian Watt’s Book, The Rise of T

Perceptions of the eighteenth Century apologue in Ian Watts Book, The Rise of The wiseThe ordinal century novel was one that changed the way novels were written in m whatsoever different ways. In reading Ian Watts book, The Rise of The Novel, quite a a both(prenominal)(prenominal) things were brought to my attention doctoring the eighteenth century novel not only in how it was written and what went into it, but how readers perceived it. This essay will look into Ian Watts perceptions on the eighteenth century novel and how it changed from previous literature. Coming out of the Renaissance and Jacobean ages, the novel was characterized by realism, with the term novel not really world used until the end of the eighteenth century. This realism was not defined homogeneous we would define realism today (defined by Webster as an interest or match for the actual or real), but instead is grounded in the position that truth can be discovered by the individual through his senses. (12 ) Instead of conform to traditional practice (such as the classical and renaissance epic based on history and fables), the novel focused more on the individual where the pursuance of truth is conceived of as a wholly individual matter, logically independent of the tradition of past thought. (13) By rejecting traditional plots the novel distinguished itself out from all other previous form of literature, making individual experience the replacement for collective tradition. Many other things apart from plot were changed for the novel to fully taper this new take on reality. Now the plot was acted out by particular people in particular circumstances (15) rather than, as in the past, by general people against a pre-determined background by appropriate literary convention. The nove... ...hough much of the literature was religious oriented, there was a great billow towards secular reading by the public of which the booksellers became largely responsible as they sought to increase t heir pay. The eighteenth century was definitely a time of large change for literature. Not only had the way of writing been drastically altered, but the amount of reading done by the public altered as well, deliverance about a re sailplanence of reading, not only in the upper classes, but also in the all the classes. Though lacking in somewhat areas, plot not be least, the novel revolutionized the eighteenth century and brought about a new way of thinking. By todays standards, it might not seem exchangeable much was done, but in the history of things, the eighteenth century novel is probably one of the biggest things to ever happen to the progression of literature throughout the years. Perceptions of the 18th Century Novel in Ian Watts Book, The Rise of TPerceptions of the 18th Century Novel in Ian Watts Book, The Rise of The NovelThe eighteenth century novel was one that changed the way novels were written in many different ways. In reading Ian Watts book, The Rise of The Novel, quite a few things were brought to my attention concerning the eighteenth century novel not only in how it was written and what went into it, but how readers perceived it. This essay will look into Ian Watts perceptions on the eighteenth century novel and how it changed from previous literature. Coming out of the Renaissance and Jacobean ages, the novel was characterized by realism, with the term novel not really being used until the end of the eighteenth century. This realism was not defined like we would define realism today (defined by Webster as an interest or concern for the actual or real), but instead is grounded in the position that truth can be discovered by the individual through his senses. (12) Instead of conform to traditional practice (such as the classical and renaissance epic based on history and fables), the novel focused more on the individual where the search of truth is conceived of as a wholly individual matter, logically independent of the tradition of past thought. (13) By rejecting traditional plots the novel distinguished itself out from any other previous form of literature, making individual experience the replacement for collective tradition. Many other things apart from plot were changed for the novel to fully display this new take on reality. Now the plot was acted out by particular people in particular circumstances (15) rather than, as in the past, by general people against a pre-determined background by appropriate literary convention. The nove... ...hough much of the literature was religious oriented, there was a great surge towards secular reading by the public of which the booksellers became largely responsible as they sought to increase their pay. The eighteenth century was definitely a time of great change for literature. Not only had the way of writing been drastically altered, but the amount of reading done by the public altered as well, take about a resurgence of reading, not only in the upper c lasses, but also in the all the classes. Though lacking in some areas, plot not being least, the novel revolutionized the eighteenth century and brought about a new way of thinking. By todays standards, it might not seem like much was done, but in the history of things, the eighteenth century novel is probably one of the biggest things to ever happen to the progression of literature throughout the years.

Cloning Essay -- essays research papers fc

For the first time the copy of a whole human cosmos seems re all(prenominal)y possible. It is absolutely necessary to consider the damage that can be do and move to curb abuses. Also, it is important to make some of the theory underlying the desire to build a develop human. The honourable Downside of Cloning With recent developments in the cloning of the first whole mammalian with Dolly the Sheep, for the first time the cloning a whole human being seems really possible. For years, clones have been the subject of popular fiction, alone the technology was lacking. presently the ethics of doing so must be carefully considered. While almost all world health and religious bodies are coming out in opposition to the idea, it must be accepted that someone somewhere will take heed it. Thus, it is absolutely necessary to consider the harm that can be done and move to curb abuses. What immediately springs to mind for most people with the possibility of cloning whole people is the ide as of creating supermen or a master race which dominated the Nazis. But the theories of eugenics from which they operated were also touted in the States and the rest of the Western world. Thus, it is important to find out some of the theory underlying the desire to build a better human. Eugenics is concerned with the social direction of human evolution. A distinction is made amongst positive and negative eugenics. Positive eugenics aims to increase reproduction of individuals who have traits, such as high intelligence and physical strength or fitness, which are considered to be valuable to society. Negative eugenics seeks to decrease reproduction among people believed to be low-level or below average mentally and physically (Glass). Cloning for better humanity, then, is unremarkably associated with positive eugenics. Overall, since the Nazi experience, eugenics as a movement has been largely discredited, but the ideas still linger and many of the same arguments for cloning hum ans are employ today, but with protests that they are not related to the abuses of the Eugenics proponents of the 1920s and 30s. The goal of eugenics was to fabricate a top-hole human being, and with this creation, to in time create a superior human race. The First International Congress for Eugenics was held in 1912 in London. earlier than being a fringe movement, it was hailed by a number of luminaries of the day. For example, Charles Darwins son... ...enal." Wilson Quarterly. 1 Apr 1992. Online. electric car Library. Kluger, Jeffrey, and Thompson, Dick. "Will We Follow the Sheep?" Time. 10 Mar. 1997. Online. galvanic Library. Lifton, Robert Jay, and Hackett, Amy. "Nazi Doctors." Anatomy of the Auschwitz finale Camp. Ed. Gutman, Yisrael, and Michael Berenbaum, eds. Bloomington Indiana University Press, 1994. 301-315. Manning, Anita. "Pressing a Right to Clone Humans Some Gays Foresee rejoinder Option." USA TODAY, 6 Mar. 1997. Online. Electric L ibrary. "Nazi Eugenic Racial hygiene Also Recognized in America." All Things Considered. Robert Siegel, host. Stefan Kuhl, guest. National Public Radio. 9 Mar. 1994. Sharp, Deborah, and Sharn, Lori. " king-size Questions for Humanity." USA TODAY, 25 Feb. 1997. Stolberg, Sheryl. "Reproductive Research Far Outpaces Public Policy." Los Angeles Times, 29 Apr. 1997. Online. Electric Library. Thomasson, Emma. "Germans Press for Ban on Human Cloning." Reuters News Service. 29 Apr. 1997. Online. America Online. "Vatican Calls for Global Ban on Human Cloning." Reuters News Service, 26 Feb. 1997. Online. Electric Library. Cloning Essay -- essays research papers fc For the first time the cloning of a whole human being seems really possible. It is absolutely necessary to consider the harm that can be done and move to curb abuses. Also, it is important to understand some of the theory underlying the desire to build a better human. The Et hical Downside of Cloning With recent developments in the cloning of the first whole mammal with Dolly the Sheep, for the first time the cloning a whole human being seems really possible. For years, clones have been the subject of popular fiction, but the technology was lacking. Now the ethics of doing so must be carefully considered. While almost all world health and religious bodies are coming out in opposition to the idea, it must be accepted that someone somewhere will try it. Thus, it is absolutely necessary to consider the harm that can be done and move to curb abuses. What immediately springs to mind for most people with the possibility of cloning whole people is the ideas of creating supermen or a master race which dominated the Nazis. But the theories of eugenics from which they operated were also touted in America and the rest of the Western world. Thus, it is important to understand some of the theory underlying the desire to build a better human. Eugenics is concerned wi th the social direction of human evolution. A distinction is made between positive and negative eugenics. Positive eugenics aims to increase reproduction of individuals who have traits, such as high intelligence and physical strength or fitness, which are considered to be valuable to society. Negative eugenics seeks to decrease reproduction among people believed to be inferior or below average mentally and physically (Glass). Cloning for better humanity, then, is normally associated with positive eugenics. Overall, since the Nazi experience, eugenics as a movement has been largely discredited, but the ideas still linger and many of the same arguments for cloning humans are used today, but with protests that they are not related to the abuses of the Eugenics proponents of the 1920s and 30s. The goal of eugenics was to create a superior human being, and with this creation, to in time create a superior human race. The First International Congress for Eugenics was held in 1912 in London . Rather than being a fringe movement, it was hailed by a number of luminaries of the day. For example, Charles Darwins son... ...enal." Wilson Quarterly. 1 Apr 1992. Online. Electric Library. Kluger, Jeffrey, and Thompson, Dick. "Will We Follow the Sheep?" Time. 10 Mar. 1997. Online. Electric Library. Lifton, Robert Jay, and Hackett, Amy. "Nazi Doctors." Anatomy of the Auschwitz Death Camp. Ed. Gutman, Yisrael, and Michael Berenbaum, eds. Bloomington Indiana University Press, 1994. 301-315. Manning, Anita. "Pressing a Right to Clone Humans Some Gays Foresee Reproduction Option." USA TODAY, 6 Mar. 1997. Online. Electric Library. "Nazi Eugenic Racial Hygiene Also Recognized in America." All Things Considered. Robert Siegel, host. Stefan Kuhl, guest. National Public Radio. 9 Mar. 1994. Sharp, Deborah, and Sharn, Lori. "Big Questions for Humanity." USA TODAY, 25 Feb. 1997. Stolberg, Sheryl. "Reproductive Research Far Outpaces Public Poli cy." Los Angeles Times, 29 Apr. 1997. Online. Electric Library. Thomasson, Emma. "Germans Press for Ban on Human Cloning." Reuters News Service. 29 Apr. 1997. Online. America Online. "Vatican Calls for Global Ban on Human Cloning." Reuters News Service, 26 Feb. 1997. Online. Electric Library.

Freedom of Choice (oedipus the King) :: essays research papers fc

People have visited physics and fortunetellers for centuries to find out what is going to happen in their future, or to help them make an important decision that they faced. This is what King Laius did in the p destroy Oedipus the King by Sophocles. King Laius, Oedipuss father went to the Oracle at Delphi. Upon receiving the fortune telling that his son Oedipus will kill him and marry his mother and commit incest with her, King Laius of his own sinless will ordered that Oedipus feet be bound by captivating his ankles together and sent him to Mount Cithaeron to perish. Laius, king of Thebes, was warned by an oracle that his son would slay him. Accordingly, when his wife, Jocasta bore a son, he exposed the baby on Mt. Cithaeron, jump pinning his ankles together (hence the name Oedipus, meaning Swell-Foot)(1).King Laius exercised his free will when he chose to believe that the prophecy would come true. Had he chosen to disregard the prophecy, thus Oedipus would have known who his parents were and would not have murdered King Laius or married Jocasta. If mans future is predestined accordingly it would not matter, but if mans fate lay in his own hands and is determined by the decisions he makes, he would be able to use the prophecies to make better decisions. Individuals can respond to a proposition or any encountered fact by instantly thinking of its opposite. Every thesis can produce an antithesis different logical meanings and patterns can then be discerned. This rational ability of the mind to take alternative perspectives means that an individual can then choose or create a refreshed synthesis from different perspectives(2). Its not that he chose to take action to action to prevent such a dastardly act, but the way he chose to deal with the situation that redress the stage for it to happen. It could be said that Sophocles was trying to demonstrate that if you choose to believe in predestination, you subconsciously deny yourself the ability of free will . Finally, perhaps faith can be seen as a form of fixing our attention upon God and thereby freely committing ourselves. The theologian Nicholas Lash says that the offset words of the Creed, "I believe in God," do not express ones considered opinion about Gods existence but affirm that all of my life is "set henceforward steadfastly on God, and God alone.

Freedom of Choice (oedipus the King) :: essays research papers fc

People have visited physics and fortunetellers for centuries to find out what is going to happen in their future, or to help them make an important decision that they faced. This is what fairy Laius did in the play Oedipus the pansy by Sophocles. King Laius, Oedipuss father went to the Oracle at Delphi. Upon receiving the prophecy that his son Oedipus will kill him and marry his sire and commit incest with her, King Laius of his own free will ordered that Oedipus feet be bound by riveting his ankles together and sent him to Mount Cithaeron to perish. Laius, king of Thebes, was warned by an oracle that his son would slay him. Accordingly, when his wife, Jocasta bore a son, he exposed the baby on Mt. Cithaeron, first pinning his ankles together (hence the name Oedipus, meaning Swell-Foot)(1).King Laius exercised his free will when he chose to believe that the prophecy would come true. Had he chosen to disregard the prophecy, then Oedipus would have known who his parents were and wo uld not have hit King Laius or married Jocasta. If mans future is predestined then it would not matter, but if mans fate lay in his own hands and is determined by the decisions he makes, he would be able to use the prophecies to make better decisions. Individuals can respond to a proposition or any encountered fact by instantly thinking of its opposite. Every thesis can produce an antithesis different logical meanings and patterns can then be discerned. This rational ability of the mind to present alternative perspectives means that an individual can then choose or create a new synthesis from different perspectives(2). Its not that he chose to take action to action to prevent such a dastardly act, but the way he chose to deal with the situation that set the stage for it to happen. It could be said that Sophocles was trying to demonstrate that if you choose to believe in predestination, you subconsciously deny yourself the ability of free will. Finally, perhaps faith can be seen as a form of fixing our attention upon God and thereby freely committing ourselves. The theologian Nicholas Lash says that the first words of the Creed, "I believe in God," do not express ones considered opinion about Gods existence but affirm that all of my life is "set henceforward steadfastly on God, and God alone.